Talk:Geastrum triplex/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Okay, let's get this party started...Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

More later. This one came together nicely, and is over the line for GA. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:59, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd note something about distribution in the lead. Stuff it, I did it myself.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Prose is fine. Article complies with MOS.


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c(OR):
 * Well-referenced to reliable sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough treatment of all important topics.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images have appropriate free use licenses.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pending a couple of revisions.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pending a couple of revisions.