Talk:Gedser–Rostock bridge

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I think they should build both bridges -- 213.39.231.199 (talk) 00:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Agree on that. Norway and Sweden should offer to pay for 25%.--Kjello (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Continuous growth?
It would appear to me that some statements in this article are based on outdated information. First, East Central Europe is no longer a high growth region, at least for the time being. Second, the "continuous growth" of traffic along this route. Any figures about that? The Fehmarn belt ferries go every 30 minutes or so while the Gedser-Rostock line is serviced only every two hours. I think this indicates that the Puttgarden-Rødby link is still the far more important one. --Johannes Rohr (talk) 08:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gedser–Rostock Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090722152551/http://www.bmvbs.de/-,302.1000913/Tiefensee-Durchbruch-fuer-fest.htm to http://www.bmvbs.de/-,302.1000913/Tiefensee-Durchbruch-fuer-fest.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)