Talk:Geek humor

Humor

 * There is some humor is this article recreation, to be sure. If its to stay as a disamb. type page, it will require monitoring.--Milowent • hasspoken  15:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It was recreated by the guy who nominated it for deletion in the final AFD.  D r e a m Focus  15:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I find that fascinating. I guess I can simply move the content I created (I saved a copy) into one of the other articles, meaning nothing will really be deleted.--Milowent • hasspoken  16:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Nothing unusual. You can always find a right place in wikipedia for properly referenced facts. Happens all the time: info about nonnotable wives of notable husbands, nonnotable books of notable writers, dormitories of universities, etc. By the way, the article was not "recreated". Disambiguation pages are not "articles": they are tools for navigation within wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:10, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Milowent, if you are serious about the jokes, I would suggest you to draw distinction between two types of humor which are referred to with the same term "geek humor": humor of geeks and humor about geeks. The most important difference is that the second kind is mostly of deprecating kind. This is what I noticed during the brief google search (and what I wanted to reflect in the disambig page, but someone disagreed). Staszek Lem (talk) 18:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)