Talk:Geelong Baptist College

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Restoration of unsourced material
Regarding the restoration of unsourced material in Special:Diff/1208619237, the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor that restores such material. I'll undo the restoration, as the paragraphs are still unsourced - please don't reinstate the paragraphs without references: per the above link, the material should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. All the best, &zwj;—&zwj;a smart kitten[ meow] 16:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Re 103.145.116.122's message in the edit summary here - yes, I acknowledge that a lot is being removed from the page. However, it is being removed because - without citations - it is not verifiable. For example, in December 2021, a name was changed in the 2nd removed paragraph from Paul Zimonyi to mike coxlong (Special:Diff/1062950573). Without citations to reliable sources, there is no way to verify the accuracy of the information in the article - hence why it was removed. Per WP:BURDEN, it should not have been restored without inline citation(s) to reliable source(s). All the best, &zwj;—&zwj;a smart kitten[ meow] 02:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)