Talk:Gelesis100

Neutrality and sensationalism
This article has been tagged for neutrality and sensationalism or material that reads like a press-release. Personally, I think the article is neutral and even handed in its current state and the references are of good quality (secondary sources, mostly from medical journals). Does anyone have any other thoughts? Ways the article could be improved? Or should the tags be removed? Rytyho usa (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , it clearly reads like a brochure for the drug.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I've made several changes to the article. What are your thoughts about its current state? Rytyho usa (talk) 03:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * , I agree it would be more helpful to propose some changes in a "change X to Y" format to make your concerns clearer. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 07:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I have addressed apparent issues and removed the associated tags. If you feel further improvements are warranted, I encourage you to make the necessary adjustments, or identify clearly the issues on this talk page for others to address. Thanks for your helpon the article. Rytyho usa (talk) 07:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)