Talk:Gender Identity Law (Argentina)

Evaluation of Article
All of the major information in this article is relevant to the mentioned article. The only thing that distracted me from the contents of the article was the phrase “allows transgender people to be treated according to their self-perceived identity”. It was phrased in a way that made it seem like transgender people’s identity isn’t perceived by the rest of society as valid but that might also just be the way I am reading the sentence. The information seems to all be up to date as well, and the only thing that I think is missing would be relevant sources for the first paragraph of the background section, as there is no evidence behind the claims made. Some other relevant information that could be added would be what led up to this law change and the steps that had to be taken before hand. Overall the article feels neutral, talking about the history behind the law instead of any opinions one way or another. None of the claims that I read were heavily biased from my perspective. The main viewpoint is historical, speaking about the laws and what led up to the decisions. It doesn’t show the viewpoint of the people or how the people worked for this change to occur. It also doesn’t bring up how people were for or against this change, only that the proposals were made. All of the links I checked worked just fine for their relevant sections. The sources that I checked on were in Spanish but a translator works just fine to validate the claims made. Not every statement is followed by a source that backs up the claim, making the article suffer as a whole. So far there’s no actual talk in the talk tab of the article but there are links to different WikiProjects that are relevant to this article. Overall this article was good but it could use a little more substance both for the publics point of view, and links to sources for all the claims made that aren’t common knowledge. EliHaven (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Elizabeth