Talk:Gendo Ikari/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 02:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. I wanted to expand the Vanitas article today so I forgot. I'll be taking this review.Tintor2 (talk) 02:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Part 1:
 * Lead
 * First of all. The Nihongo lead needs to be added to the name of the character:
 * "In the original series with the same name" This might come across as confusing. Mention if it's anime or a manga.
 * Since it's the lead you should also say "he also appeared in the series' manga adaptation among other films" or something like that.
 * Conception
 * First of all mention the series.
 * Manga needs wikilink rather than comic
 * Voice. The relationship between Rebuild and Evangelion: 3.0 You Can (Not) Redo is not explained. Maybe "the third Rebuild of Evangelion film, Evangelion 3.0 Yo Can (not) Redo)
 * Appearances
 * Neon Genesis Evangelion could be trimmed since the first two paragraphs is the backstory which is briefly explored in the tv series.
 * The section of Rebuild has some big paragraphs which I would suggest trimming or splitting especially in the staff commentary.
 * Wasn't Gendo actually killed during Instrumentality in the manga? I remember he does not get eaten by the manga but gets some time of peace in his death.
 * True. He sees Yui before dying. I added this part.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

I'll continue the review later.Tintor2 (talk) 14:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay. Tried my best for the moment.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 15:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Man. This guy sure was scary.
 * Part 2.
 * Characterization
 * The second paragraphs feels way detailed just for how he manipulates the two doctors and Kaji as it doesn't affect him
 * "In the twelfth episode of the series, in Antarctica, Gendo argues with Fuyutsuki about the philosophical implications of the Second Impact, claiming "science is the strength of man" and that Antarctica, completely melted and devoid of life, is "a world cleansed of original sin" Doesn't really mean anything to me about the character. Is it really important?
 * The reference to Devilman and its next paragraph seems to focus together about the ideal of becoming a god. It might fit both of them being together due to the subject.
 * Critical reception.
 * They originally were one single paragraph, but I'd rather leave them separate so as not to create a WoT.

Other than that the everything else seems well written. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 15:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The second paragraph needs an introduction based on what's its subject.
 * Done. Hope it works.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Passing it. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)