Talk:Generation II reactor

Is the first sentence meant to read 'evolutionary' as opposed to revolutionary?

There is no such thing as a en II or Gen I. Gen IV was dubbed by the DOE for developing new plant types in 2000. In 2003 the French CEA was referring to Gen II types in Nucleonics Week, "Etienne Pochon, CEA director of nuclear industry support, outlined EPR's improved performance and enhanced safety features compared to the advanced Generation II designs on which it was based." (Vol. 44, No. 39; Pg. 7). But The first thing there was was Gen IV. The rest is a ex-post fabrication. -- Eiland (talk) 09:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Generation I, II, and II were proposed as nomenclature when Generation IV was introduced. It is "ex-post"--Work permit (talk) 04:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Generation I link loops back to current page. Anthony 1l (talk) 03:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Generation II reactor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613091957/http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?sectionCode=132&storyCode=2057693 to http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?sectionCode=132&storyCode=2057693

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)