Talk:Generation Snowflake

This article is redundant
The article Snowflake (slang) contains much of the same information, and this page adds very little. It also seems that the term itself is barely mentioned in normal usage. It would be better for this to exist as a section on the aforementioned Snowflake page, instead of having almost an entire page of rewritten information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:F642:F100:7D8E:D2F8:C71A:9668 (talk) 23:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Agree, and in fact the reason for creating the Snowflake (slang) article was with a view to an eventual merge. The combination of "generation snowflake" was mostly driven by that nasty old woman to plug her book, with the complicity of the worst British tabloids. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I support a merge as well. Generation Snowflake → Snowflake (slang). Who wants to start the formal proposal? There are a lot of these terms that ought to be merged or combined. See also call-out culture and cancel culture. - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 04:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Agree.Sourcerery (talk) 23:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Yes I agree let's go ahead and delete this article, and/or merge it with the Millennial article. This article feels editorialized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.74.71 (talk) 01:54, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I say go ahead. Not a lot of participation but consensus has been achieved. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 02:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done - Paul T [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psantora&action=edit +]/C 04:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)