Talk:Generative design

Hello - I will add sources after the article about Georg Nees has been completed--Maxim Pouska (talk) 10:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Suggested edits
The last sentence is misleading and needs improving or deleting. Generative art/architecture does not necessarily require feedback loops. Indeed, dataflow programming (as with Rhino Grasshopper) does not in general include cycles. Also the quotes need to be properly referenced. 82.12.206.4 (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

this text is adverising blabla by Autodesk - please delete it
this Text: "Generative design is a technology that mimics nature’s evolutionary approach ..."

Latest revision as of 03:11, 3 July 2016 (edit) (undo) 183.193.113.168 (talk) That is advertising language.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 08:55, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Strongly agreed, and it got even worse! the Fusion 360 advertising has no source! 2804:7F0:B1C1:D1EC:C6A8:3957:CDD9:3C20 (talk) 00:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Capitalisation of article name
Generative Design → Generative design? Bookwormgirl910 (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

"Algorithmic design" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Algorithmic design. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:32, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Queen Elizabeth II Great Court not generative design
The form-finding of the Queen Elizabeth II Great Court do not fit my understanding of the presented definition of generative design as the applied form-finding approach by Chris Williams only generates one solution, not several. Sehlstrom (talk) 08:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)