Talk:Genetic studies on Bosniaks

Y-DNA frequency in Sandžak
I placed WP:CITENEED tags at the same-named section (later removed section). The Bosniak DNA Project is not "scholarly material" (WP:SOURCETYPES), and if we consider this project's sampling as a "study" (which is not), per WP:SCHOLARSHIP should be avoided for inclusion.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 20:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * What are you saying is an advice only. There is no such requirement in the links above. Bozdugan (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That page is a standard, not an WP:ESSAY. The second provides advices or opinions.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * "Many", "when available", "usually" - sounds like an advice to me. Bozdugan (talk) 09:27, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Nobody cares what's your or mine opinion - or you edit according to editing policy, or you do not.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * perhaps specifying it does not come from a scholar source but from a public DNA project where users have to send in their DNA results since there have been no genetic studies on Bosnians from Sandžak.Durraz0 (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The approximate frequency and variance of haplogroup I-P37 clusters in Eastern Europe.jpg

According to haplogroups study from 2004, controled by EU, this article is so fake!
Oxford journal once published results of haplogroups study in former Yugoslavia from year 2004 and no, Bosniaks (population from entire Bosnia) is unique with +50% of haplogroup "I", it is long way population with the most haplogroup "I" in Europe, much more than Scandinavians.

So no, population in Bosnia is not at all similar to population of neighboring countries. Yes, there were migrations from Bosnia to neighboring countries, so we are able to found today in Serbia or Croatia haplogroup "I", but those are not Serbs or Croats created there, those are migrants from Bosnia who arrived mostly in last 100 years from Bosnia in Serbia or Croatia! Article is fully wrong and I will suggest deleting fake propaganda.

Source: Oxford Journal Study conducted 2004 by: Institute for Anthropological Research, Amruševa 8, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; †Estonian Biocentre, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; ‡School of Public Health Andrija Štampar, University of Zagreb Medical School, Zagreb, Croatia; §University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, Scotland; ∥Medical Faculty, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina; ¶Clinical Hospital Center “Bijeli Brijeg,” Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina; #Emergency Unit of Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro; **Medical Faculty, University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo; and ††Medical Faculty, University of Skopje, Skopje, Macedonia © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2A01:E0A:13B:5580:155C:3C4D:90C4:ED7F (talk) 07:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)


 * According to 2013, 2017 and 2020 autosomal marker studies on 506, 1000 and 600 unrelated individuals, it was confirmed that the Bosnian and Herzegovinian population has highest distance from Turkish people, and highest similarity to Croatian, Serbian and Slovenian people. All three Bosnian and Herzegovinian ethnic groups share a similar genetic background with mostly negligible differences (Bosniaks being closer to Bosnian Croats than to Bosnian Serbs).
 * Yes, there is 0% similarity in Bosnia with Turkish people, but also it is small similarity with Serbs and Croats. Yes, some percentages of "I" haplogroup are present in Serbia and Croatia today, but mostly those are migrants from Bosnia who arrived there from Bosnia in near past, and stats there mark them as Serbs and Croats, but they are not! For example lot of Bosnian refugees arrived in Serbia and Croatia during Serbo-Croatian agression on Bosnia, today for stats in those countries, they are Serbs and Croats, and genetically they are not, they are Bosnians! 2A01:E0A:13B:5580:155C:3C4D:90C4:ED7F (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your commentary but it is greatly misunderstanding the topic and genetic research conclusions. There's no such thing as "genetically Bosnian" and all three ethnic groups of Bosnians (Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs) are much more similar to each other, and near nations, than nationalists would want to admit and make others believe. Please refrain from such commentary in the future.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 08:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your commentary but it is greatly misunderstanding the topic and genetic research conclusions. There's no such thing as "genetically Bosnian" and all three ethnic groups of Bosnians (Bosniaks, Croats and Serbs) are much more similar to each other, and near nations, than nationalists would want to admit and make others believe. Please refrain from such commentary in the future.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 08:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)