Talk:Gengoroh Tagame/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 18:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey I will be reviewing this article. Review will be soon. Link20XX (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

I have completed my initial review. Great job overall, just a few things needed before it can be promoted.

Checklist:
Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments:

 * In the second paragraph of Themes and Motifs, link the article for the word "pejorative", as I doubt most English speakers know what it means.
 * The link for source 3 doesn't appear to work, you may need to get the archive link.
 * Optional, but it may be a good idea to replace ’ with '.

That is it. Address each mandatory issue and I will promote it. Link20XX (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Both mandatory issues have been resolved. Morgan695 (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The changes resolved both issues. The result of this review is Pass. Congratulations! Link20XX (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)