Talk:Genzyme

Product details
It would be interesting to have a table showing the annual revenues from each product, and the date of patent expiration. -- Beland (talk) 00:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Biotechnology 105.245.101.118 (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Genzyme. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.milforddailynews.com/business/x1528515155

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Wikipedian Sign Language  Paine  05:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 7 July 2016
Genzyme → Sanofi Genzyme – Company name has changed due to change of ownership by Sanofi Corporation. Sterlingvernon (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC) Sterlingvernon (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   05:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)  --Relisting. No such user (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose. A change of official name has little relevance under our article naming conventions. The question is, what's it commonly called? This doesn't seem to have changed since Sanofi acquired Genzyme in 2011, and may never do so... why would people use the longer name? Andrewa (talk) 20:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Andrewa. I understand the article naming conventions and the goal of appealing to the most probable, common name of something. But in this case, the company has an official name. It is on all of the products and materials from the company. And it is now the correct, legal name. If naming consistency is not in place, it creates confusion about what the actual name is and perpetuates incorrect nomenclature. I'm sure the goal of wikipedia isn't to encourage incorrect nomenclature so I'm confused as to why it would be deemed incorrect to use the actual name. It really isn't much longer, even. Sterlingvernon (talk) 21:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak oppose. While we routinely obey name changes for corporations and similar bodies, the company itself does not seem to push the new composite name, still using the short title throughout their own website, including the "about" page. Both names are in widespread use across news sources. . No such user (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Genzyme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060924143610/http://www.gaucher.org.uk/cercer.htm to http://www.gaucher.org.uk/cercer.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

01783025141 2401:1900:C0:5F83:0:0:0:1 (talk) 00:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)