Talk:Geoffrey Samuel

Why are Samuels' opinions being layered through Buddhist articles?
Why? Seen his opinions in Karmapa controversy, in Tibetan Buddhism, and in Nyingma so far. Which are odd because his opinions are slightly weighted and bordering on mischaracterizations, as if his purpose is denigration. Yet it says here he's a scholar. Just wondering who's responsible so I can better understand. Pasdecomplot (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * And, why is his promotional page in Wikipedia?