Talk:George C. Pimentel

Encyclopedic style needed
Today's edit (16 Sept 2008) contains much useful information which should be reatined, but it needs to be rewritten in a more encyclopedic style. It now reads as if copied from an article about him, and I wonder about copyright violation. Also some of the statements are excessively enthusiastic with no real content and should be removed, for example "George Pimentel’s research has had a profound effect on chemistry". What does that actually mean? Dirac66 (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The addition was apparently copied from National Academies Press so I have reverted it. ChemGardener (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

OK. I have however added this National Academy of Sciences site as an external link, to make the information accessible without copyvio. Dirac66 (talk) 21:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Picture
A portrait-picture and other pictures always improve an article. Good article. -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 19:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George C. Pimentel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005011043/http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v43/i3/p96_s1?bypassSSO=1 to http://www.physicstoday.org/resource/1/phtoad/v43/i3/p96_s1?bypassSSO=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Inert gas bonding and compounds
Professor Pimentel said that his early submissions on the subject were tabled for many years by the journals. Was this a matter of national security? 71.193.43.251 (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)