Talk:George Dalgarno

Javirl 11:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC) This article lacks reference to Dalgarno's artificial language, which is truly interesting. I'll add it when I have the time.

what kind of language?

 * Dalgarno was also interested in constructing what he called a 'philosophical language', now more usually referred to as universal language.

These are different concepts; to choose between them, I'd need to know a bit more about his purposes. —Tamfang (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


 * They are different concepts now, but at the time (1600s) universality is pretty much what all the philosophical languages were going for. (Or looking for the original 'Adamic language', but I think they'd consider that roughly equivalent to 'universal'.) See e.g. Leibniz's similar work at around the same period. I don't know Dalgarno's, but it's a reasonable guess that it was doing the same. --Sai ¿? ✍ 00:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Dalgarno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060810201023/http://www.cce.ufsc.br/~espanhol/projborges/tlon.htm to http://www.cce.ufsc.br/~espanhol/projborges/tlon.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)