Talk:George Hysteron-Proteron

Notability
As this character seems to have appeared in only one novel, shouldn't this be reformatted as an article about the novel? The page doesn't really indicate any sort of pop culture notabilityfor the character such that he would frequently be referenced outside of discussion of the novel. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 20:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 4 June 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. The character and the book he appears in are both questionably notable, and the RM proposer wants the article to be rewritten from the ground up to change its scope. This stuff is certainly outside the scope of the requested moves process; try nominating the article for deletion instead. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

George Hysteron-Proteron → The Twelfth and After – This character doesn't seem to have any notability of himself--certainly the article makes little case for him to be notable enough to have his own article. The novel doesn't but probably should. The article would need to be rewritten by someone who has read it. I have not. Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 21:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nom. Although I'm not convinced that even the novel is notable enough for an article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:51, 8 June 2022 (UTC)