Talk:George Nenyi Andah

Peacock and Lack of Sources
The article repeatedly (and without sources) refers to Andah with high praise for personal characteristics (His passion, his strong work ethic, his talents, his vast expertise) which are irrelevant to his professional history. Throughout, it reads like a particularly friendly workplace biography or an autobiographical entry. The reference section appears to be an uncited list of people who have worked with him and I'm unsure of the relevance of the hobbies section, as great as dogs are. --82.138.194.108 (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)