Talk:George S. Day

Reassessing article
because: Churn and change (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There are citations at all
 * Infobox has nothing much
 * Books do not have ISBN, publication details
 * Nothing on the person as a person (birth year, some information on personal life)
 * Formatting issues (the "Contents" list looks odd)
 * Too many red links; the books just don't seem notable enough for their own articles
 * Not enough details (exactly which department did he teach in at Stanford?)