Talk:Georges-Antoine Belcourt/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments

 * Arctic, thanks for your hard work on making the previous reviewer's recommended changes. I know you were great with turning things around quickly with the Education in Malta article so it not getting passed the first time was just a fluke of crossed schedules. My job here is easy: pass. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)