Talk:Georgies/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Danielyng (talk · contribs) 17:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

I plan on reviewing this article for its Good Article nomination. --Danielyng (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)--Danielyng (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking this on! Armadillo  pteryx  18:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Intial Comments and Review
I would first like to emphasize that this Article is particularly well written. It contains a wide variety of media, and ample citations and sources. All of the sources and citations come from well established and reputable sources and contain no original research. The article is descriptive and contains clear and concise facts, in readable prose. From what I can tell, the Article meets the criteria for a Good Article.

Well Written
The article is clear, straightforward, and well written. Formatting is well thought out.

Verifiable with no original research
All citations are from reputable sources; no original research.

Broad in its coverage
The detail is a little too much, but not at an unacceptable level (in my opinion.) The article is broad, and covers everything needed regarding the subject.

Neutral
Relatively neutral, not biased.

Stable
Judging from the edit History, it is and has been stable.

Illustrated
Good amount of media, complies with copyright & fair use guidelines.

Danielyng (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)


 * This was an easy review as it's clear you already went over this article several times and ensured it meet the criteria prior to nomination. Congratulations!
 * Thank you! Armadillo  pteryx  22:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)