Talk:Georgina Adam

Cleanup
Paging for cleanup. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  22:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , can you kindly mail me the FT piece? I am highly unconvinced about her deserve-ability of an article and am thinking of an Afd as a very-realistic prospect. &#x222F; WBG converse 16:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I can't access it at the moment. I don't want to break confidence, but Megalibrarygirl has not been able to commit much time to Wikipedia recently for personal reasons; please give her a chance to review the article first. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , fine enough:-) &#x222F; WBG converse 16:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Also we could probably redirect somewhere like The Art Newspaper if there aren't enough sources forthcoming. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * On a note, I dislike this trend of creating/promoting random articles, per a variant of ILIKEIT and then, scampering for sources.
 * As SeraphimBlade was saying the other day:--Find the sources first. If you can't, refrain from writing the article.
 * If you can't justify the sourcing of an article, (with immediacy), please leave it for MLG or whoever has experience in the field to do the promotion.
 * P.S--It's more of a general reflection than on this specific issue. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 18:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you can't justify the sourcing of an article, (with immediacy), please leave it for MLG or whoever has experience in the field to do the promotion.
 * P.S--It's more of a general reflection than on this specific issue. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 18:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * P.S--It's more of a general reflection than on this specific issue. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 18:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)