Talk:Gerald Muench

I request readers of this article to improve it further, which is newly created Hashemi1971 (talk) 07:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Deletion
Recommended deletion, as subject is not sufficiently notable. (Also, text reads like a CV, with trivial details included.) Refer to Wikipedia's notablity guidelines, and also biography and neutrality guidelines.  —DIV (137.111.13.4 (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC))
 * And this after you vandalized this page (about 6 months ago)? Register an account and you can take this to AfD if you must, but as an IP you cannot create the necessary pages. I have reverted your vandalism and removed the (incomplete) AFD template. --Randykitty (talk) 14:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I suggested the article on Gerald Muench be deleted, primarily due to a lack of notability. I don't appreciate having my suggestion called "unhelpful" (on the IP talk page).  I also don't appreciate the ignorant assertion that I carried out any vandalism (ever).
 * As it happens, I am using a new IP, and was curious whether anyone had made any previous WP contributions from this IP. Only one, which was the article on Gerald Muench.  I did not check what the edits were, and as far as I'm concerned they're irrelevant.  I stand by my proposition the article be deleted.
 * If the template was incomplete, perhaps you could be 'helpful' and complete it, or else come up with a defence as to why the article can't be deleted. Are you associated with Gerald Muench?
 * If you would adhere to WP policy yourself, you would note in the hypertext the message
 * Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled
 * Furthermore, on the article page is written:
 * Unregistered users placing this tag on an article [...] should leave detailed reasons for deletion on Talk:Gerald Muench.
 * And this I also adhered to. So try not to be so condescending to 'IP' users.  I have a history of many helpful contributions on WP as an 'IP', from other addresses.
 * —DIV (137.111.13.4 (talk) 23:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC))
 * Sure, sure. I have responded to your message on my talk page. And for some reason, your comments don't make me eager to help you out here and I have other things to do, too. So please go find somebody else. I'll remove the invalid AFD tag again in a minute, please don't put it back because without a valid AFD discussion page, it won't have any effect (and if I don't take it out, a bot will eventually remove it). --Randykitty (talk) 09:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)