Talk:Geraldine Page/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Auldhouse (talk · contribs) 22:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

I'd be glad to review this article. Auldhouse (talk) 22:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good use of references and no issues. I fixed one dead link with an archive URL.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I ran the article through Grammarly which picked up few minor copy edit and phrasing issues which I fixed. Auldhouse (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * This is a great article--I enjoyed reading and reviewing it. Page was one classy actress. Auldhouse (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This is a great article--I enjoyed reading and reviewing it. Page was one classy actress. Auldhouse (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: