Talk:German aircraft carrier II/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Petebutt (talk · contribs) 21:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't think this is working properly Petebutt (talk) 21:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
I see nothing wrong with the Article in question. Would it be acceptable if I formally do the GA business or would it be better if I wait for the original reviewer to respond? Thurgate (talk) 12:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Critique
With only 10000 hp (7500 kW) there is no way the ship could reach 32 knots. If it was ten times more it would look reasonable. 18 March 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.237.96 (talk) 08:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)