Talk:German aircraft carrier I (1942)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  c Not applicable :
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  c Not applicable :
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Suggestion only add a note to explain what a double bottom is.
 * Are these the correct links for the anti-aircraft guns 10.5 cm FlaK 38, 3.7 cm FlaK 43, 2 cm FlaK 30/38/Flakvierling if so they can be added.
 * The two notes needs citations.
 * The lede comment eventually seized by the US Army and used as a troop transport following the end of the war. is not covered in the article so needs a citation.
 * Presumably Navweaps.com has been proved to be a RS.


 * Would a link to double bottom suffice?
 * Yes, those are the right guns - links added.
 * Notes have cites now.
 * Not sure how I forgot to include that in the body, but it's there now.
 * Navweaps has been discussed a couple of times, see for instance here, and the conclusion is that it is a reliable source (though with the stricter requirements for FAC these days, it does not meet 1e anymore). Essentially, it's fine for GA and below, which is as far as this article will go. Parsecboy (talk) 13:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass GA Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)