Talk:German destroyer Z33/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 06:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

I will take this one, comments to follow in next few days. Zawed (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Lead
 * There is several uses of "damaged", including two in the same sentence. Consider paraphrasing some of these.
 * Good idea.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Modifications
 * "they were replaced by weapons from the taken from the wreck of the heavy cruiser Lützow": the first "from the" needs to be deleted
 * The section refers to 15 cm; 3.7 cm; 2 cm: shouldn't there be dashes in there for consistency with previous usage where the "centimetre" is recited in full?
 * No, the MOS says a non-breaking space between abbreviated measurements, not a dash.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Service history
 * link Lützow (and shouldn't it be the Lützow?
 * Linked in the Modifications section. You can use "the ship", but you need to be consistent and I generally don't use it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Whoops, apologies, I overlooked that. Zawed (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Other stuff
 * Image tags check OK
 * No dab links
 * No dupe links
 * No external links so no issues there

Overall, minimal issues and those that are there should be straightforward to address. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * All good, passing as GA now. Zawed (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)