Talk:German torpedo boat T18/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 21:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Claim this one. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * for the Kriegsmarine (German Navy) during World War II. Completed in mid-1941 Link WWII.
 * blockade runners and U-boats through the Bay of Biscay into the Atlantic Ocean Unlink the Atlantic Ocean.
 * T18 returned to Germany in mid-1943 and became a training ship Pipe Germany to Nazi Germany.
 * where she was sunk by Soviet aircraft in September Link Soviet.
 * Anti-aircraft defense was provided by a single Link AA defence.
 * Redundant to anti-aircraft gun
 * ports in the Bay of Biscay en route to Japan Pipe Japan to the Empire of Japan.
 * the Italian blockade runner Himalaya failed in her attempt Pipe Italian to the Kingdom of Italy.
 * U-boats is overlinked.
 * Link Axis.
 * On the return voyage, T18 was sunk by Soviet aircraft Is there more information than we have here about her sunk?
 * Sadly, no.
 * by a single 3.7 cm (1.5 in) SK C/30 anti-aircraft gun superfiring over the 10.5 cm gun Sea of Blue.
 * Technical paragraph
 * No edit war.

Infobox
 * Maybe merge the "Type 37 torpedo boat" links.

Sources
 * Switch both Whitley's books because the sources should be in alphabetical order and if there are two books from the same author then the year is important. "German Destroyers of World War Two" should be above "Destroyers of World War Two: An International Encyclopedia"
 * No, alphabetical by title overrules year.
 * No, no I mean you've two books of Whitley one is made from 1991 and another one from 2000. My point is to switch those books from the 1991 book below Rohwer's book instead of the 2000's book. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I mean that I sort an individual author's books by title, not year.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh I see my bad in this case nevermind. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * No OR.

Images That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me.
 * Okay I wasn't done I just added another comment but now I am. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You're welcome mate. I'll pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)