Talk:Gerontology Research Group

This article is stunted, POV, even silly
The Gerontology Research Group is more than just a group of researchers who meet at UCLA. The idea that one must be somewhere in person is antiquated. In this age of telecommunication, tele-working, videoconferencing, e-mail, and a 24-hour, 7-day a week information economy, to suggest that only those who meet in person, and not those on the group discussion e-mail list, should not count is just plain hypocritical. After all, what would Wikipedia be if only those Wikipedes who meet with the Wikimedia Foundation in person were considered part of the Wikipedia editing team? Ryoung 122 08:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

contradictions
I flagged the last statement claiming "as of aug 20, 2015", where the supporting ref is from April 2015. also the list of the verified oldest people has >48 entries. if this list is different from teh gerontology group this should be made clear in the article. --Wuerzele (talk) 02:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I resolved the contradiction by re-acessing the reference, updating the ref date and accessdate, and updating the number being tracked. The number at the list of verified oldest people need not be the same as the number here. Ca2james (talk) 06:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)