Talk:Gersten Pavilion

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gersten Pavilion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101102235952/http://la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1984/1984v1pt1.pdf to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1984/1984v1pt1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Stub?
The main content of this article is now about nine sentences or 117 words long. It does not seem to have changed much in the past 10 (!) years, so one wonders whether there is actually much more of interest to be said about Gerston Pavilion at all. In these circumstances, it isn't obvious what useful purpose the stub templates serve. I suspect that for the general reader they detract from the authority of the content that there is in the article as it stands. I'm only a wikignome and don't really know whether or how stub templates help other editors, but I've been bold and removed them. --Frans Fowler (talk) 01:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)