Talk:Gervase de Cornhill/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sabrebd (talk · contribs) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I will be reviewing this article. On first read it looks to be of high quality and is fairly short, so this probably will not take me very long.--  SabreBD  (talk) 21:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I've added the counties. I've removed the dash - it's actually significant that we say "1155 through 1157" or "between 1159 and 1160" - I'm following my sources exactly in how they word things (or I should be!) ... there weren't formal start and end dates for appointments in this period ... so the source is conveying nuance that I don't want lost. And Barlow's not very good at telling me who was the source for what in this narrative - but it appears to be a consensus of many of the sources, given the footnotes. If I was going to FAC with this guy (I'm not, you're right that this is pretty much IT as far as stuff about him and it's a bit too scant) I'd worry about WP:YEAR, but here, it's not a biggie and I think it looks really odd to use xxxx-xx, personally. Thank you so much for the review! Let me know if there are other things you want addressed. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * That is all fine. Most of this is just suggestions and I very much appreciate the problems of sources for this kind of topic. This is good work and I am happy to pass it for GA. Keep up the good work.--  SabreBD  (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)