Talk:Getlink

Contradiction
The article states passenger figures are lower than predicted and than later states there are plenty of passengers for both ferries and the tunnel

What logic could shareholders have offered the tunnels creditors to forgive billions in debt on a tunnel and even worse, what kind of investor would throw money as such a bad idea? GodsTeam

Contradiction Explanation
The creditors forgave a substantial amount of their debt in exchanage for shares in the company. The debt was pretty much worthless as it could not be repaid, so the creditors received shares which gave them more control and a share from future profits. 184.98.58.36 (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

debt payoff
The following reference ( from the Guardian, and others you can find via "eurotunnel debt" in Google News) suggests an improving situation (about time) which could need a change or two in the start of the article. Linuxlad (talk) 19:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Le Shuttle
Did this company used to be Le Shuttle or was that a differernt channel tunnel operator? Simply south (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * As far as I know it was simply a brand used for the car and truck trains. Definately not a separate company.Imgaril (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

1996 fire article problems
Hello, could someone look at 1996 Channel Tunnel fire as it has a few issues, -the most suspicious of which is the claim of fitting of a fire suppression system in the HGV wagons - this is complete news to me so confirmation would be appreciated. There's a message on the talk page.Imgaril (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Eurotunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304040145/http://www.railpro.co.uk/issues/pdfs/feb08_interview.pdf to http://www.railpro.co.uk/issues/pdfs/feb08_interview.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Is the logo really a Fair Use logo?
I suddenly found, except the file extension name, I couldn't see any reason that Commons file is different from our "Fair Use" one. Looked through c:COM:TOO France, I even think that this logo can't be copyrighted within France, but just can be trademarked. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Notifying the local uploaders here: . --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I frankly didn't realize that Getlink was French company, and that the French had a generous TOO standard. I have no specific justification for it being non-free, I just sorta assumed since I thought it was British, which has a pretty aggressive TOO standard. I'll downgrade and transfer it to the Commons later today.--The Navigators (talk) 05:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Fresque 25 ans Eurotunnel.jpg