Talk:Getty Research Institute/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: harej  19:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality: Clear and understandable. I am not sure what was meant by "Semantic Web supply," but the source did not mention it so I removed the phrase.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: Article is logically organized.

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources: Yes
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Yes, but citations to print sources should include page numbers. Also, "Getty Research Institute. Records, 1991-1999." is an unclear citation.
 * C. No original research: No original research.

Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects: The article serves as a sufficient summary of the Institute, including its history and activities.
 * B. Focused: The article is sufficiently detailed.

Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias: Yes

Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: Very stable.

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: N/A
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: The article could use more images, such as the logo, pictures of relevant people, or photographs of their facilities, but I am not sure that such pictures are available.

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

harej 19:37, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for conducting the review. I have added a photo of the exterior of the GRI Headquarters Building. Racepacket (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

I have added page numbers to the extent that I could locate them, and clarified the citation to ""Getty Research Institute. Records, 1991-1999." which is an online library catalog entry explaining how GII programs were folded into GRI. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 10:01, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Article passed. hare j 19:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)