Talk:Ghana Freedom/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 10:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Immaculate
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Copyvio detector shows up well. Referenced suitably
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Having had no prior knowledge, I was well educated
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Although the majority of the reception was praise, it was well backed up by sources.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable, only one prior editor.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images would be extremely useful in this situation. Cannot find any, however
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Very well written and verified. Will need photos for improvement, as mentioned