Talk:Ghazanchetsots Cathedral/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk · contribs) 19:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" ! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute !           | Review Comment
 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * colspan="3" | 1. :


 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * colspan="3" | 2. :


 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * colspan="3" | 3. :


 * - style="vertical-align:top;"
 * colspan="3" | 6. :

Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments

 * full text of an inscription
 * you may be right that the full text of the inscription should not be included in the article, but one thing to note is that it is the only inscription on the church. This might make it significant.
 * Shushi: The City of Tragic Fate
 * Yes, I do think the source is reliable. It is published by a well-known publishing house in Armenia and is edited by the former foreign minister. The chapter cited is by Shahen Mkrtchian who wrote a seminal book on the architectural monuments of Karabakh in the Soviet period. Ե րևանցի  talk  09:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * close paraphrasing
 * reworded
 * File:Շուշիի զինանշանը.png
 * Yes, it belongs to the government of Karabakh. Corrected.
 * Non-reviewer comment: The Gallery section contains a completely indiscriminate WP:IG. Based on the captions, one illustrates early 20th century history, four of them in the 21th century (the text mentions no changes being made between 2007 and 2015, so why we should see what it looks like in slightly different weather conditions at slightly different times of the year is unclear), two focus on specific architectural features (for which we have an appropriate section in the article), and one has no caption at all so its purpose remains a mystery. In sum, the Gallery is indiscriminate. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I've removed the gallery section altogether. -- Ե րևանցի talk  09:59, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You've addressed all my concerns and I believe the page passes GA criteria. Thanks for writing about this interesting topic! Also, sorry that I forgot to change the page's template to "on hold." Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)