Talk:Ghost imaging

Unseen, etc.
Even though popular press is using phrases such as "images that are unseen", this is neither accurate nor explanatory. "Unseen" isn't accurate because light does hit an object and does hit a detector. It just doesn't happen in the same way as camera. Of course, it also doesn't help explain how the technology/science works. Therefore it should be avoided here. Jmattthew (talk) 04:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Ghost imaging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080513050042/http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn13825-quantum-camera-snaps-objects-it-cannot-see.html to http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn13825-quantum-camera-snaps-objects-it-cannot-see.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

More work needed to exploit new sources
The article now seems a bit too concise. In the light(!) of the emerging richness of this topic, more details from the recently added modern sources could be added to the article to enrich it. Layzeeboi (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)