Talk:Giancarlo Pallavicini

This article has been published in full, in Italian, in the editions of Wikipedia, in 5 books published by Books LLC, Wiki Series, Memphis, USA, 2011, www.booksllc.net - Copyright: http://creativecommons.org/licenses /by-sa/3.0/deed.it ISBN 9781231726426 "Academies and Cultural Institutes in Italy"; ISBN 9781232068365 "Born 12 February" - ISBN 9781231726341 "Italian Academics" - ISBN 9781231977576 "Company executives Italian" - Other: "Italian Economists" It will be necessary to review the translation in English, which was probably done with a non-perfect program. --188.152.135.253 (talk) 12:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Somebody wants this article
This article has been 'created' three times now.
 * (cur | prev) 16:19, 9 June 2013‎ Cambiami2 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (24,312 bytes) (+24,312)
 * (cur | prev) 18:11, 23 May 2014‎ 2Michea (talk | contribs)‎ . . (27,492 bytes) (+24,414)‎
 * (cur | prev) 19:59, 2 May 2017‎ Desiano (talk | contribs)‎ . . (26,335 bytes) (+24,305)‎

Each time, it appeared to others that the text was simply a text dump of a machine translation and not wikified. Twice now editors have cut the text down to a very small size. (Note that the French article is also of small size, but seems to have been created that way.)

A Wikipedia source may have been Giancarlo Pallavicini (economista). Ah, yes, the size of the Italian article at first appearance here would seem to correspond to there and then:
 * (corr | prec) 22:42, 15 apr 2013‎ Cambiami2 (discussione | contributi)‎ m . . (26 883 byte) (+5)‎ . . (→‎Pubblicazioni) (annulla | ringrazia)

And we also see user 2Michea editing that article there. And also user Desiano editing.

Besides the lack of wikification, there were no refs/cites/links in the original text dumps. Someone(s) have added a couple. What was mentioned somewhere (and I've lost where (found)) is that checking "What Links Here" finds at least two articles that mention this person, and those refs/cites could be of use here.

Irregardless of the bad form by which the article was created, can we avoid more of the "no - yes - no - yes" wasted motions? I'll poke at trying to wikify and recover linkages. Then y'all can argue about whether to keep individual parts. Shenme (talk) 01:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)