Talk:Gigolos

Jimmy Clabots is Jimmy Dior
Please stop removing "Jimmy Dior's" real name from this article. Wikipedia is not censored. Claims from anonymous IP editors about Clabots's motives for using a pseudonym are unsupported. If Jimmy Clabots were notable enough to have his own Wikipedia article then his appearance on this series and his pseudonym would be noted in it. Harley Hudson (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

At least one two recognizable porn actress
If anyone is looking for verification of the claim that at least some of the sex scenes are possibly staged, in episode 7 the "timid housewife" is instantly recognizable as big-bust model and XXX actress Brianna Costello - she even uses the same first name in the episode. And another one, Claudia Marie, appears later in the episode. 68.146.78.43 (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Legitimacy
I am confused. This article says there is some proof that the women do not pay the sex workers. A bold claim, because if it is true then the gigolos on the show are outright lying. I mean, them getting money from their clients is talked about a lot on the series. Mdriver1981 (talk) 07:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gigolos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20120910011530/http://www.sho.com/site/gigolos/home.sho to http://www.sho.com/site/gigolos/home.sho

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments??
Is there really evidence that this article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments? Can anyone speak to that? I would support deleting the page or at least the puffery if that were actually true.Aroundthewayboy (talk) 23:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)