Talk:Gilhemoire

[Untitled]
Hi there, I'm a bit confused. I don't see any notes here on what exactly needs fixing, or why this article was tagged as requiring cleanup...

I see that it's been listed as a "Start" article, however I'm having trouble understanding why. I realize that a reader might want more info, however further info just might not exist. I've done an extensive bit of research into this individual, as he's the progenitor of my family line. There really isn't much more information out there about him than what is already on this page.

I've been through several revisions of this article before having it be excepted, and frankly I use Wiki all the time and roughly 80% of the articles in existence on Wiki are less informative than the Gilhemoire article, and with significantly fewer sources...

Please, in simple english, explain what is it you'd like to see done with this article, and I will take another stab at trying to make it 'wiki-perfect'.

Without specificity however, I have no idea where to even begin...

- Brand of Amber — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brand of Amber (talk • contribs) 16:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

OMG. Seriously! I DID sign my comment. My apologies for not using four tildes. When your rules are completely NOT intuitive, you really can't expect folks to know what it is that you want done!

You know what, just ignore everything I've written here. Wiki sucks. I'm done here. Brand of Amber (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Brand of Amber (talk) 16:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC) Let's hope that works...  Sheesh.


 * Hi, I saw your feedback for our project. So let's start:


 * The article needs a cleanup since it uses too many italics, boldings and somehow too many sections and other stuff. These tags are not bad or forbidden, experienced user will hopefully come here and fix the tags.
 * The article was rated as start since it is simply correct. But don't give the rates too much weight. Nobody is interested in such ratings (except it is a WP:GA and WP:FA - our very best)
 * For further improvements, you might look at the Template:Cite web and style your web sources better ;)
 * Regards, mabdul 12:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)