Talk:Gilmour Space Technologies

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (trying to create a page that starts off talking about technology we are working on as it is new. i dont see any reason for being deleted as there is a page on spacex and rocket lab which are other space companies. have tried to make it fact based and not biased in any way.) --Adam gilmour (talk) 04:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The page sat without any changes since creation which is why I placed a CSD tag. In it's current form, it doesn't credibly indicate importance for the encyclopedia. If you add more reliable sources and change the tone of the article to be neutral and less like a fact sheet, it may become encyclopedic. I will remove my nomination for now to give you time to handle this. -- Dane 2007  talk  04:37, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

thanks, i am unsure how to attach the sources i see as i can add newspaper articles and university websites etc

ill do some investigating to see how to do that. regards adam Adam gilmour (talk) 04:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Leading company
What makes this a “leading” company? That language is usually marketing puffery. Leading what? Says who? Nate Silva (talk) 19:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

I have removed it as no one has justified the claim. DatMeleeMan (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Eris-400/Eris-L?
Is the Eris 400/Eris-L launch vehicle still planned? I couldn't find any recent information regarding it. DatMeleeMan (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC) https://web.archive.org/web/20200227153939/http://www.gspacetech.com:80/launch

RASTA name meaning?
Does RASTA happen to be an acronym for "Recovery And Separation systems Test Article"? DatMeleeMan (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Engine names
An engine was once referred to as G-70. Does anyone know if the other engines have names and what rockets & stages they are for? DatMeleeMan (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)