Talk:GioGio's Bizarre Adventure/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 05:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Review will commence: soon. Cognissonance (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Overall

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Found no flaws with this one.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Cognissonance (talk) 08:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! In case you were wondering, I cited that EW source because of "re-creates the look and feel of its source material with exacting detail", but sure, it's not as directly about visuals as some other of the refs.--IDVtalk 08:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Took me another look to find it. I wasn't sure if it was praise or simply objective description, but it works. Cognissonance (talk) 08:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Took me another look to find it. I wasn't sure if it was praise or simply objective description, but it works. Cognissonance (talk) 08:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)