Talk:Girl's Garden

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Girl's Garden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.movietome.com/users/Panzer_Zwei/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=m-100-25632366
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726213404/http://www.vgrebirth.org/games/game.asp?id=2671&redirect=%2Fgames%2Fbrowse.asp%3Fplatform=23&start=G to http://www.vgrebirth.org/games/game.asp?id=2671&redirect=%2Fgames%2Fbrowse.asp%3Fplatform%3D23%26start%3DG
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090213212119/http://retrogamer.net:80/show_image.php?imageID=2559 to http://www.retrogamer.net/show_image.php?imageID=2559

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Removing all mentions of Girl's Garden as "dating sim." It's... not.
I keep seeing references to Girl's Garden as an example of a dating sim. This is not a justifiable claim. I know it's in the Ars Technica article, mentioned in a glancing blow:

"Significant early dating sims include Girl's Garden and Tenshitachi no gogo, while the Tokimeki Memorial series has been highly popular since its inception in the mid-'90s."

Nevertheless, the claim is not true and doesn't deserve a place in this article.

Girl's Garden is an arcade game with a "win the affection of ____" element present in many games of its era. That does not make it a dating sim any more than, say, Donkey Kong, Popeye, or any other similar action-arcade games. I am editing this article accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swanwonder (talk • contribs) 02:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Legacy section
The legacy section as of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Girl%27s_Garden&oldid=1108189501 opened with entire paragraph based on a two small paragraphs in articles from USGamer from 2013 and 2016 ; two sentences from the first, and one from the second. Why these articles? It makes no sense. It makes even less sense if you go and read the source articles, which aren't actually about the game. It reads as if someone searched for the game online and wanted to shoehorn something from those articles in. The legacy is the launch of YU2's career, the affect the game had on the platform (if any) and influence on other games (if any). 2001:8B0:10BD:39AE:EA6A:64FF:FE39:48DC (talk) 08:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Why not those articles? USGamer is a reliable source per WP:VG/RS. Is your concern that there is not more commentary from other sources? Might you have an issue with something these critics wrote? Regarding the second point about Naka, I workshopped it a bit. I see I misread "formed". My bad. I like the "headed" wording more. TarkusAB talk / contrib 09:04, 28 December 2022 (UTC)