Talk:Girl in Danger

Requested move 2 October 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   03:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

– A minor "B" film from 89 years ago is the sole Wikipedia entry bearing this exact main title header. However, since the dab page also lists two WP:DABMENTIONS, there is no need for such an obscure putative WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Girl in Danger → Girl in Danger (film)
 * Girl in Danger (disambiguation) → Girl in Danger
 * Oppose. Things are perfectly clear the way they are. There is no other article with the same name, as nominator himself explains, so I find there is no need for a change. The film is not that obscure nor that minor, by the way.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  09:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose unless others are notable but it could still be primary anyway.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 19:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose: There is only one article with this title so this move would be unnecessary. Whether or not the film is minor or old is irrelevant. That's not a strong enough justification to make the disambiguation the focus when there is only one article with this title. Aoba47 (talk) 01:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)