Talk:Giuseppe Firrao Jr.

Untitled
Recent edit warring seems to have been the result of one editor inadvertently removing information as part of what he claimed were only formatting changes. Upon challenge (and revert), he didn't check his edits carefully enough to realise his mistake, and instead just reverted back to his version. This is a good example of where staying WP:CIVIL and actually listening to other editors will help resolve the situation quickly and with as little humilition to yourself and others as possible.

I've reverted his edits, and then repeated his formatting improvements. The little crucifix sign in the infobox I'm not sure about. Is it common for Catholic cardinals (or priests, bishops, whatever) to have a crucifix symbol appended to their name? If so, it should presumably be left in place. Cheers, and take it easy, Fuzzypeg★ 01:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The crucifix typically stands for "deceased", but I've never seen it used in that location. Usually it is present in lists of names to denote living and deceased, or in the case of articles covering historic battles, names of those killed in action. Unless there's another reason for its being in this article, I'd suggest it be removed. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 06:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

The sign
The crucifix sign was placed, because he is deceased, but if you say its place looks to be improper I do not insist about it at all.Drjmarkov (talk) 08:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)