Talk:Giuseppe Sermonti

Untitled
Ah yes, more fair and evenhanded treatment of anyone who dissents with a naturalistic paradigm. That 'psuedo' suffix played a starring role in this wiki-entry on Giuseppe Sermonti. If you want information on him, go elsewhere. Many of the wiki-authors are more concerned about their agendas than actually giving fair treatment to someone who disagrees with their worldview. --Jorge Kluney.

Italian version
I'm going to translate from Giuseppe Sermonti's italian version, because here there aren't a lot of things about him. Can anybody help me, please?

Not a Creationist
Just because someone is anti-evolutionary does not mean he/she is a creationist. Sermonti is a good example of this. I would like to point out that he says he is not a creationist. "For the reservations I harbor about Evolutionism, I have been accused of being a Creationist. I am not: if I am allowed, I would only aspire to being a creature." —Preceding unsigned comment added by IronCrow (talk • contribs) 02:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Source? Guettarda (talk) 05:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Why would you need a source? You do not have a source to say he is a creationist, you have a quote saying he isn't. It's stereotyping to state that anyone who is not an evolutionist is a creationist. That's like saying just because some guy is a Christian, he can't be an anarchist. I myself is an example (I do not believe in evolution, but I do not believe in creationsm in those terms either). Second, he already stated he is not a creationist, "For the reservations I harbor about Evolutionism, I have been accused of being a Creationist. I am not: if I am allowed, I would only aspire to being a creature," which is already in the article. And if you need a source stated ID is not creationist, then check the Creation, Intelligent Design, and related articles. Or look here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/01/28/do2803.xml Also, might I add, check the Antievolution article, which states: "Anti-evolution is a term for systems of thought, scientific or non-scientific, which argue that the biological theory of evolution is inaccurate. The term applies to most forms of design philosophy, Lamarckism, creationism, animal spiritualism, and any other ways of thinking denying or proposing alternatives to evolution." IronCrow 06:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * IronCrow, you do believe in evolution (I read your profile and that blog you had), you just don't believe that natural selection is the deciding factor in evolutionary theory. Maybe you're confusing evolution with natural selection (and that rant about creationists being deluded as much as a fanatical atheist was a good bit - you should come back to Wikipedia). 98.198.83.12 (talk) 04:17, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Giuseppe Sermonti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060618101247/http://www.aidsinfobbs.org/openforum/forum14/6633 to http://www.aidsinfobbs.org/openforum/forum14/6633
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909231853/http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/06/of_form_over_su.html to http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/06/of_form_over_su.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)