Talk:Give Yourself a Try

Removing sourced content
The Telegraph describes "Give Yourself a Try" as a "fizzing indie rock" song. Additionally, NME describes the song as "a remarkably lo-fi return from a band who rarely do things by half-measures.". Idolator, a pop culture website, describes it as a "post-punk anthem". Please do not remove sourced content based on opinion.  Gia co bbe  talk 17:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can see that the Telegraph called it "fizzing indie rock". Fair enough. Vice said the song was "like a semi-jokey revival of early 00s indie rock." Which kind of supports the Telegraph except for the "jokey" part.
 * NME is not saying it's a song in the lo-fi genre. NME is only saying it's more lo-fi than the band's usual stuff, which is not strong enough to define the song.
 * Outlet Mag says the song "blends emo with post-punk revival". I can see that this assessment is not represented in the article body.
 * Song genres are defined by multiple sources agreeing, not by one source saying one thing and another source saying another thing. You can talk about various genres in the article body but when you say explicitly "this is the song's genre" it better be supported by multiple sources in agreement. Binksternet (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Is lo-fi a genre? According to its Wikipedia page, it's a production quality. You are correct in saying that NME does not say it's a song in the lo-fi genre, which is why it is not in the infobox as part of the genres. I wouldn't include "futuristic", "hazy", or any other production quality in there (as examples), since they are not genres. I think re-wording to avoid confusion might solve this issue. In terms of outletmag.co, I saw it when writing this article and chose not to include it out of WP:RSP. The "FAQ page" is blank, the "Our Team" page is also blank, and while I couldn't find an "About Us" section, the website's description on Google reads: "Outlet is a space where creative minds can come together and publish unique content on a daily basis for the enjoyment of our readers." Thus, I have no way of verifying that it has any sort of editorial oversight.  Gia co bbe  talk 18:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)