Talk:Givors canal/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Soham (talk · contribs) 11:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

I am starting the GA review for the concerned article. Soham 11:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Lead: (French: Canal de Givors), IPA would be nice. Soham 17:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not confident with French IPA, and have no idea what the Franco-Provençal language IPA would be. I think this one has to wait for a native speaker. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Leave it, even some FA's don't have IPA. It's not a hard and fast requirement for a GA.  Soham  15:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What are Locks? Link.  Soham  15:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Plans: Ref #4 WP:DEADLINK. Soham 17:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Looks like the content was moved to a new, dedicated site. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

The rest looks fine, I'll read again and then give the verdict.  Soham  14:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Soham.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Does not contain peacock, weasel words along with other kinds of puffery.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 27 refs for an article on such a regional topic is commendable. Most sources are either magazines or books by noted authors, moreover there is no sign or original research. Good for me.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutral POV, no issues regarding that.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No reversion of the primary author, no signs of WP:EW, article rock steady.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Well illustrated.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Good article passed, well done.
 * Good article passed, well done.