Talk:Gjøvik Olympic Cavern Hall/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mitch 32(20 Years of Life: Wikipedia 5:33) 23:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

My main issues are as outlined. They aren't anything crazy, but I think they are simple to address:


 * 1) This is usually discretionary, but May I suggest renaming References and notes, promoting the level 3 header to Level 2 and renaming it to References.
 * 2) The lack of photography is rather displeasing, not a requirement, but also the article looks very dry indeed without them.
 * 3) Try delinking or bluelinking the link in the first citation. The red wiki-links in the article citations usually isn't the most pleasing thing in the world.

However, I will pass the article, thanks for nominating and providing me my first GAN review in 1.75 years. Good job! Mitch 32(20 Years of Life: Wikipedia 5:33) 23:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the "express service" (must be the fastest nomination to review time I have experienced) and I'm glad you've come back to do some reviewing. I've made a short stub for the red link in the reference, the other two red links in the article are on my list to do soon (but they will require a bit more work). I would love to have some indoor pictures, but I haven't found any, so this is as good as it'll get for the time being. Arsenikk (talk)  09:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)