Talk:Glastonbury Canal/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

I'll finish this one soon. JAG UAR   22:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "The Glastonbury Canal ran for just over 14 miles (23 km)" - I think "just" sounds a bit informal for the opening sentence
 * " In the 1750s, the town became a spa town" - link spa town
 * "At the Highbridge end, the plans for a floating harbour to accommodate vessels of up to 250 long tons (250 t) were dropped" - tonnes (British English)
 * " and a cavalcade from Highbridge to Glastonbury and back" - 'and back' sounds informal and vague here
 * "They were declared bankrupt and Richard was removed from office as town clerk" - who's Richard?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References check out OK, reliable sources, no evidence of OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutral
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable, no edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images used
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I couldn't find anything worthy enough for this to be put on hold, so I'll pass it now. It's a well written article that meets the GA criteria, well done! JAG UAR   11:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have dealt with most of the queries above, except tons v tonnes as this is always difficult as it may be long ton as it depends on the source and time period.&mdash; Rod talk 11:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)