Talk:Glaze3D

Confusion
"The 1200 model's claimed specifications would place it as the rough equivalent of the GeForce FX 5200 Ultra or Radeon 9200 Pro, while its claimed performance would place it at the same level as the GeForce 3 Ti 500 or Radeon 8500."

So, which one is it? --Iceheart3910 17:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The performance claims were being made by Bitboys and so were compared to cards of the time. I think the author of the article was comparing the technical specifications to cards that came later (that is to say, the GeForce FX and Radeon 9000 series were built with the number of units/pipeline configs/etc. that the Glaze3D would have had). Tech specs and actual performance could see large discrepancies, so even though no actual hardware was made, despite its ambitious futuristic design it still could have performed worse than the claims. Fishy c (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)